Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 1225-8962(Print)
ISSN : 2287-982X(Online)
Physical Therapy Korea Vol.24 No.2 pp.76-91
DOI : https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2017.24.2.076

Musculoskeletal Pain Status of Local Farmers in Tigray, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Min-jae Jeon1, Hye-seon Jeon2
1Dept. of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University
2Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University
Corresponding author: Hye-seon Jeon hyeseonj@yonsei.ac.kr
April 10, 2017 April 10, 2017 May 15, 2017

Abstract

Background:

Agricultural work is physically demanding and is associated with a high frequency of musculoskeletal disorders. It is challenging to comprehensively understand the present status of work-related diseases and injuries among farmers in underdeveloped countries.

Objects:

This study aimed to elucidate the current status of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in local farmers in Tigray, Ethiopia, and identify the agricultural factors associated work-related musculoskeletal pain (AFWMP) and healthy living and healthy behavior factors associated work-related musculoskeletal pain (HFWMP).

Methods:

The Institute for Poverty Alleviation and International Development at Yonsei University conducted a survey of 126 households in Tigray, Ethiopia in 2014. A total of 116 individuals (73 men, 43 women) representing each household answered the questionnaires.

Results:

1) Work-related musculoskeletal pain (WMSP) most commonly occurred when performing heavy lifting and most frequently occurred in the lower back. 2) Age, self-perceived labor intensity, and months of farming work were significantly higher in the pain group than those in the non-pain group. 3) Overall work-related musculoskeletal pain intensity (WPI) showed positive and negative correlations with years of farming experience and self-perceived health status, respectively. 4) In binary logistic regression, the occurrence of WMSP showed significant associations with self-perceived labor intensity. 5) On multiple linear regression analysis, age, months of farming work, and self-perceived health status had a significant impact on overall WPI.

Conclusion:

The WMSP of farmers in Tigray, Ethiopia was related to the characteristics of farm working and health status. Furthermore, HFWMP and AFWMP were the chief factors affecting the occurrence of WMSP in farmers in Tigray. Therefore, both HFWMP and AFWMP should be considered for clinical health assessments of farmers with WMSP in underdeveloped African countries.


초록


    Introduction

    Farmers’ work includes physically heavy labor and frequently a combination of excessive postural load, handling of manual materials, and the use of muscular force (Nemeth et al, 1990; Nevala-Puranen et al, 1993). Therefore, work-related musculoskeletal disorders are common health problem among farmers (Phajan et al, 2014). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are described as pathological conditions of the musculoskeletal system which result from acute damage due to a one-time trauma or which are related to cumulative traumas such as excessive force, repetitive motion, sustained or awkward postures, and sitting and standing for prolonged periods of time (Da Costa and Vieira, 2010). A systematic review exploring the reasons for work-related musculoskeletal disorders identified awkward static or dynamic working postures, heavy physical work, and lifting as the chief biomechanical risk factors for the progression of lower back pain (Da Costa and Vieira, 2010). The risk factors which provide evidence of the causal relationships for the development of work-related musculoskeletal disorders include biomechanical factors (i.e., excessive repetition, awkward postures, and heavy lifting), high psychosocial work demands, high body mass index, the presence of co-morbidities, and smoking (Da Costa and Vieira, 2010).

    In several population-based studies, musculoskeletal syndromes were more common among agricultural workers, with more substantial symptoms affecting the forearms and hands, hips, and lower back compared to those affecting the less physically demanding, non-agricultural occupations (Holmberg et al, 2002; Kolstrup, 2012; Skovron et al, 1994). Throughout the work day, agricultural workers are exposed to various physical risks, such as working with the trunk in sustained flexion, lifting and carrying heavy loads, exposure to vibration from farm vehicles and power tools, unpredictable actions of livestock, and risks of trips and falls on slippery and uneven walkways (Walker-Bone and Palmer, 2002). The particular type of musculoskeletal symptoms and region of the body affected vary according to the type of farming task (Rosecrance et al, 2006). For example, farming tasks that involve reaching overhead are a risk factor for shoulder disorders, while the use of tractors resulting in whole-body vibrations has frequently been associated with the risk of lower back symptoms (Fulmer et al, 2002; Sorainen et al, 1998).

    One of the poorest countries in the world by any standard, Ethiopia is a country in eastern Africa with a population of 80 million (Hurissa, 2011). According to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Ethiopia has a low human development index score (UNDP, 2010). According to the Federal Democratic Republic Of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency, farming is the core activity in this country, where approximately 84% of people engaged in several agricultural activities work to sustain their livelihoods (FESA, 2009). Maize, sorghum, teff, wheat, finger millet, barely, and common beans are the main crops in almost all regions of the country in spite of the variation in the volume of production across Ethiopia (Assefa et al, 2014; FESA, 2009). Subsistence farmers who work small, fragmented plots of land in Ethiopia produce approximately 96% of the farming output (FESA, 2007). Agriculture in Ethiopia has suffered due to the persistence of traditional farming implements and systems of subsistence farming as well as the inadequate use of contemporary agricultural advances, which has led to poor performance (FESA, 2011). The Tigray region is commonly regarded as an environmentally degraded state located in the northern part of Ethiopia (Abay et al, 2009; Aseyehegn et al, 2012). The highland region of northern Ethiopia and the Tigray region are particularly prone to drought, where the risks to farming production are prevalent (Gebregziabher and Holden, 2011). The rainfall in this region is insufficient and erratic, and the soils are generally poorer than those of other regions (Abay et al, 2009). The environmental stresses faced by agricultural workers in the Tigray region have been particularly worsened by the limited infrastructure (Abay et al, 2009).

    Although the observed relationship between gross domestic product and health expenditure is misleading for health policy in some populations (Kanavos and Mossialos, 1999), the low level of awareness about healthy perceptions and behaviors combined with the prevalent preference for traditional treatment options might cause substantial challenges for the use of health services in farmers in underdeveloped countries such as Ethiopia (Abera et al, 2015). Furthermore, although there is a need for public health intervention programs targeting healthy living as well as the treatment and causes of musculoskeletal disorders in low-income settings, there has been limited information regarding the health-related perception and behavior of farmers as well as their preferred options in Ethiopia. While work-related musculoskeletal disorders in farmers cause significant health complications and productivity loss, previous studies have focused only on the overall health factors in agricultural workers (Jo et al, 2016).

    A previous study of farmers in of Tanzania, an underdeveloped country, reported that musculoskeletal pain was significantly correlated with agricultural work, as well as with health and socio-economic factors (Jeon et al, 2016). In Ethiopian farmers, better physical conditions may result in better production or higher labor productivity, which may, in turn, increase economic growth and household income (Croppenstedt and Muller, 2000). Similarly, poor health may result in work loss or decreased worker capacity, which is likely to decrease output.

    Data from the Large and Medium-Scale Commercial Farms Sample Survey of Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia provide an indication of the extent and status of specific agricultural sectors in this country (FESA, 2011); However, the survey does not include questions regarding the musculoskeletal symptoms of the residents (FESA, 2011; Rosecrance et al, 2006). Although numerous epidemiologic studies have reported on injuries in farm workers, there are limited data on the agriculture-associated injuries in Ethiopia, where the majority of farmers are engaged in subsistence farming; to our knowledge, no studies have assessed the nature and causes of these musculoskeletal disorders among agricultural workers in this country (Lewis et al, 1998; Lyman et al, 1999; Rosecrance et al, 2006).

    Because farming is a core industry in Tigray of Ethiopia, detailed prevalence information on work-related musculoskeletal disorders is needed in order to understand the total burden and characteristics of musculoskeletal syndromes (Lee and Lim, 2008; Lee et al, 2014). Therefore, it is necessary to determine the prevalence rates in order to assess the degree of these problem and to identify risk factors, especially as some risk factors may be unique to Ethiopian farmers working within specific environmental contexts such as the Tigray region (Osborne et al, 2013). These findings are clinically useful to understand the many types of musculoskeletal symptoms among Ethiopian farmers (Lee et al, 2014). The Institute for Poverty Alleviation and International Development located in Yonsei University, South Korea, conducted a survey to investigate the status of work-related musculoskeletal pain (WMSP) among Tigray local farmers in Ethiopia, and identify the agricultural work factors of work-related musculoskeletal pain (AFWMP), and identify the healthy living and healthy behavior factors of work-related musculoskeletal pain (HFWMP) affecting local musculoskeletal pain in agricultural workers.

    Methods

    Study Regions and Respondents

    Tigray is divided into four sub-regions, Central, Eastern, Western, and Southern Tigray. It consists of 673 villages (tabias) and 47 districts (woredas). According to the 2007 census, there are approximately 992,000 households and 4,317,000 people in Tigray. The famer’s work of this region is cultivating predominantly the soybean and is characterized by subsistence farming producing mainly vegetable crops and cereal for sale and local consumption (Aseyehegn et al, 2012). Hawzen is a district in the sub-region of Eastern Tigray (Figure 1). According to the 2007 census, there are approximately 118,000 people and 25,000 households in Hawzen, which corresponds to an average household size of 4.71 individuals (Abafita and Kim, 2015).

    The villages of Selam and Simret in Hawzen contain approximately 2,400 households. Of the approximately 2400 households in these villages, 126 were selected by random cluster sampling. We interviewed 126 individuals (73 men, 43 women) from these villages. However, ten respondents were excluded from the analysis due to incomplete information. Before participating in the study, all respondents agreed to provide their information.

    The pain and non-pain groups were defined as follows: In the last 12 months, agricultural worker who experienced or not experienced any pain in the bone, muscle, and joint in the body during or after the physical work in the field or farm.

    Procedure

    We amended the survey questionnaire to emphasize the interdisciplinary features and to measure the WMSP related to agricultural activity and the health status of the rural villages in Tigray. The survey was executed in three stages. In January 2012, a pilot study was conducted to evaluate the applicability of the research tool in the Hawzen village setting (Abafita and Kim, 2015). After examining the data and assessing which queries worked, we reorganized the survey questionnaire and redrafted the questions in order to better fit the native context. In February 2013, we interviewed the 126 randomly selected households, including 62 and 64 from Selam and Simret, respectively. The present investigation collected data on socio-demographic characteristics and farming activities at the household level. In April 2014, the survey was implemented to collect data on self-rated health status, nutritional status, disability, health-related behaviors, and musculoskeletal disorders among the villagers (Abafita and Kim, 2015).

    In the rural region of Hawzen, there are no addresses, and houses are dispersed far from one another. Given the restrictions in the financial plan and study period, the logistical difficulties allowed us to complete interviews with only 126 households in Selam and Simret. Lecturers from Mekelle University and 15 graduate students were hired and educated as enumerators. All of them were fluent in English and Tigrinya. The enumerators visited the households nominated in the sampling and transcribed the interviewee responses according to the questions in the questionnaire. The head of the household generally replied to the questions. However, other members of the household such as the spouse also answered the questions (Approximately 17 households). The interview process lasted approximately 50 minutes per household. The agricultural department of the Hawzen local government in Eastern Tigray region authorized the performance of the survey in two villages (Abafita and Kim, 2015).

    Survey

    The investigation design was similar to that of the Ethiopian Rural Household Survey (Dercon and Hoddinott, 2004) in terms of the information collected. However, our investigation data were more detailed than that collected by nationwide large-scale investigations such as the Ethiopian Rural Household Survey, which offers additional comprehensive and profound understanding of the study area. As our investigation focused primarily on WMSP, our research sample included only the 116 respondents from the main sample of 126 surveyed households (Abafita and Kim, 2015).

    The survey consisted of nine sections (Table 1). Among these sections, we primarily focused on the fourth and fifth, which collected information about the characteristics of the agricultural work and health status related to the presence and intensity of WMSP. The years of agricultural experience was calculated by subtracting the age at which the participant began to engage in agricultural work from the current age.

    Data Analysis

    Descriptive statistics such as means and standard deviations were used to examine the health and workplace environmental characteristics of Tigray farmers and the prevalence of WMSP. One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) statistical tests were performed to determine the normal distributions of each variable.

    Significant differences between the pain and non-pain groups were analyzed by independent t-tests. Chi-square tests were used to examine the associations in the proportion of subgroups of farmers with and without WMSP based on health and agricultural work status. Bivariate analysis using Spearman correlations was used to analyze the correlations between the WMSP and AFWMP, HFWMP.

    Binary logistic regression analysis (BLR) (entermethod) was used to determine the odds ratio of the risk of WMSP and to determine the 95% confidence intervals according to the health and agricultural work variables. We estimated three types of BLR: (1) Model 1 evaluated the effect of variables associated with AFW, including age. (2) Model 2 additionally adjusted for gender. (3) Model 3 included the variables from Model 2 and additionally adjusted for chronic disease. Multiple linear regression analysis (MLR) was used to analyze the factors that affected the overall WPI. In the MLR, overall work-related musculoskeletal pain intensity (overall WPI) was the dependent variable, while the age, months of farming work, self-perceived labor intensity, and self-perceived health status were the independent variables. Statistical analysis was performed using International Business Machines Corporation SPSS Statistics ver. 21.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows.

    Results

    Status of socio-demographic factors(SDF), AFWMP, and HFWMP in Tigray farmers

    Table 2 presents the total study sample according to SDF, AFWMP, and HFWMP. Among the agricultural workers represented by the sample, 61.3% were male and 36.1% were female. The mean age was 49.0 years and the mean height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were 162.9 cm, 52.3 kg, and 19.7 kg/m2, respectively. The average months of farming work and das of work per week were 8.0 and 3.7, respectively. Chronic disease was reported by 28.6% of the respondents; 100.0% were non-smokers, 78.4% drank alcohol, and 10.1% exercised regularly. The mean self-perceived level of happiness was 4.2 and the mean self-perceived health status score was 62.4. Finally, the for medical expense was 1053.84 birr in an emergency situation at once.

    WMSP prevalence in the pain group

    The 88 participants with any WMSP were asked to respond to additional questions about the location of the WMSP and the pain-evoking physical movements (Table 3). The prevalence of WMSP was highest for lifting heavy objects (55, 62.5%), followed by kneeling or squatting for long periods of time (53, 60.2%), pulling and pushing heavy objects (48, 54.5%), reaching toward far objects (25, 28.4%), and bending and twisting of the back (21, 23.9%). The prevalence of WMSP in the pain group was highest for the lower back (46, 52.3%), followed by the shoulder (44, 50.0%), upper back (43, 48.9%), knee (40, 45.5%), and wrist/ hand (30, 34.1%).

    Correlations between WPI and SDF, AFWMP, and HFWMP

    The results of the Spearman correlation analyses between overall WPI and SDF, AFWMP, and HFWMP are shown in Table 4. Overall WPI had low to moderate correlations with SDF, AFWMP, and HFWMP (r=-.349~.505). In the pain group, each of the WPIs according to physical movements were slightly correlated with SDF, AFWMP, and HFWMP (r=-.338~.497). Each of the WPIs according to body part was slightly correlated with SDF, AFWMP, and HFWMP (r=-.306~.332). However, sick days during the farming season was found moderately correlated with the WPI of the shoulder (r=.520, P<.01).

    Factors affecting the overall WPI

    The results of MLR analysis on the variables affecting overall WPI are presented in Table 5. In case four predicting variables (age, months of farming work, self-perceived labor intensity, self-perceived health status) were applied simultaneously to the model, it was statistically significant (F=4.756, p=.002) and accounted for overall WPI approximately 18.6% (R2=.186, adjusted R2=.147). However, only three variables (age, months of farming work, self-perceived health status) were showed statistically significant (P<.05). Self-perceived labor intensity was not a significant variable for the prediction of overall WPI (P>.05).

    Comparisons of the pain and non-pain groups

    Comparative analysis of farmers with and without an WMSP revealed no significant differences in SDF (gender, height, weight, BMI, educational level), AFWMP (months of farming work, days of work per week, job satisfaction), or HFWMP (level of happiness, importance of health, chronic diseases, drinking, hand washing, regular exercise, expense for medical emergencies) (P>.05). However, age, self-perceived labor intensity, and years of farming experiences were significantly higher in the pain group than in the non-pain group (P<.05), while the self-perceived health status score was significantly lower in the pain group than that in the non-pain group (P<.05) (Table 6).

    Factors influencing the presence of WMSP

    BLR analysis (Table 7) showed that older farmers (odds ratios; OR: 1.040, 95% confidence interval; CI: 1.004-1.077), and those with higher self-perceived labor intensity (OR: 2.522, 95% CI: 1.533-4.150) had an increased likelihood of experiencing a WMSP in model 1. In model 2, older farmers (OR: 1.039, 95% CI: 1.003-1.076), and those with higher self-perceived labor intensity (OR: 2.516, 95% CI: 1.526-4.147) also had an increased likelihood of experiencing a WMSP. In model 3, older farmers (OR: 1.036, CI: 1.001-1.073), those with a higher self-perceived labor intensity (OR: 2.661, CI: 1.586-4.465), and those who worked fewer days per week (OR:.628, CI:.397-.994) had an increased likelihood of experiencing a WMSP.

    Discussion

    The major objective of this research was to determine the status of work-related musculoskeletal disorders such as WMSP and WPI and to investigate AFWMP and HFWMP of Tigray local farmers in Ethiopia. The main results of this study revealed that among the 116 respondents, 88 reported having WMSP. These WMSP were mostly noted when the farmers were kneeling or squatting or pulling, pushing heavy, or lifting heavy objects. Among the 10 body parts, the WMSP were most prevalent in the lower back, upper back, and shoulder (Table 3).

    Although the health service coverage is 86.7% in Ethiopia, free services for the poor are unevenly distributed and utilization remains low (32%) (Federal democratic republic of ethiopia, 2007). In the study in the Amhara region of Ethiopia, 995 (5.6%) respondents were sick for over two weeks preceding the investigation and only 38.7% of them had visited health facilities (Fantahun and Degu, 2003). Consequently, farmers in this region do not generally obtain remedial interventions for WMSP. Given the regional differences in subjects participating the study, our results are in partially agreement with those of numerous other studies (Kolstrup, 2012; Lee et al, 2014; Nonnenmann et al, 2008; Osborne et al, 2013; Xiao et al, 2013). Research on Thailand farmers conducted by Phajan et al (2014) also reported the highest prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the lower back and shoulder. However, the results of WPI according to physical movements in our study differ from those of Kolstrup (2012), who studied work-related musculoskeletal disorders in 66 farmers and 37 employed farm workers according to ergonomic work factors and physical exertion. There are several explanations for these differences in findings. First, the farmers in this study were subsistence farmers who traditionally operate on fragmented small plots of land and infrequently use machines, tools, or instruments. Second, farming of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), produced primarily in Tigray, requires squatting and bending postures (Assefa et al, 2014). Finally, the major cereal crops grown by farmers in this area, including teff, barley, and wheat, have relatively short heights (Deressa, 2013).

    Lifting is the chiefly ascribed cause for lower back pain (Osborne et al, 2013). Lifting and pushing movements increases the risk for progressing work-related musculoskeletal disorders, as agricultural workers frequently push, pull, and lift bulky and heavy objects (Phajan et al, 2014). Relocation of those items exposes agricultural workers’ spines to excessive pressure forces. Long-term exposure to these conditions increases the risk of losing equilibrium, and therefore, the farmers were exposed to spinal discomfort, muscle stress, and muscle trauma (Phajan et al, 2014). This finding was in agreement with other studies on the association between dynamic labor and work-related musculoskeletal disorders (Phajan et al, 2014).

    The farming industry relies on physical labor and is one of the riskiest industries (Lee et al, 2014). In the Tigray region, moisture stress such as recurrent droughts, and environmental degradation such as limited infrastructure, and wars including the most recent clash with Eritrea, all of these restrict the development of improved farming output, which subsequently increases the physical work demands and WPI in the agricultural industry (Aseyehegn et al, 2012; Gebregziabher and Holden, 2011). Detailed occurrence statistics on these outcomes are essential to understanding the nationwide burden and distribution of musculoskeletal symptoms among agricultural workers in Ethiopia and the associated need for intervention and healthcare resources (Lee et al, 2014). Therefore, more research is needed to identify the ergonomic risk factors affecting WMSP in Ethiopian agricultural workers living in specific conditions (Lee et al, 2014).

    Agricultural work is vital, hazardous, and accomplished predominantly by farm workers who are at risk for pain associated with musculoskeletal injuries, which are influenced by various factors including workplace hazards, limited access to medical care, cultural health beliefs, and demographics (Brock et al, 2012). The results of our study revealed significant differences between the pain and non-pain groups in age, self-perceived labor intensity, years of farming experience, and self-perceived health status. In contrast, there were no significant differences between two groups in the other factors assessed in this study (Table 6). As can be seen in results of the BLR (Table 7), older farmers and those with higher self-perceived labor intensity had increased likelihoods of experiencing WMSP in all three models.

    The pain group was older and had a lower level of self-perception of health status compared to those in the non-pain group. The more overall WPI farmers have, the lower their perception of self-health. In agricultural work, overall WPI increases with increasing age and years of farming experience. The MLR revealed that age, months of farming work, and self-perceived health status were the major predicting variables for overall WPI (Table 5). The results of correlation analysis revealed that WPI according to physical movement including kneeling or squatting for extended periods and lifting heavy objects were positively correlated with age. WPI according to physical movements including reaching toward far objects was negatively correlated with months of farming work, while WPI according to body parts including the upper back and shoulder were negatively correlated with months of farming work. Overall WPI was positively correlated with age and negatively correlated with months of farming work and self-perceived health status. WPI according to physical movements including pulling and pushing heavy objects was negatively correlated with self-perceived health status, while WPI according to body parts including the upper and lower back were negatively correlated with self-perceived health status.

    Unlike our expectation, the relationships between WPI (according to body parts and physical movements) and AFW showed that as the months of farming work increased, WPI of body parts such as the upper back and shoulder and physical movements such as reaching toward far objects decreased. These results are the controversy somewhat with duration factor of overuse syndrome. WPI by body parts was not significantly correlated with variables such as days of work per week, age, and years of farming experience that reflect the general characteristics of the working duration. This did not support our expectation that increased workload of labor will increase WMSP, which is supported by the findings of a study of Swangnetr and Kaber (2014), who reported that the age and experience of the farmer influence the occurrence of musculoskeletal pain. This may be due to the fact that farmers who are permanently exposed and experience repeated impairment contribute significantly to the presence of WMSP compared to the effects of short-term exposure to agricultural work.

    Musculoskeletal complaints and pain have a major impact on work in terms of presenteeism (reduced performance and productivity at work), long-term inability to work, and absence due to illness (Phillips et al, 2008). In our study, the reasons why overall WPI and the AFWMP variables showed only low correlation with WPI according to the body part and physical movements might be explained by other physical and psychological characteristics of musculoskeletal pain. Given the fact that each of the farmers in this study cultivated several types of crops with different growth characteristics depending on the season, the agricultural working environments in are very different. However, the WPI according to the body part and physical movements were assessed simultaneously. If the investigation had been performed immediately after similar farming work, the correlations and associations between WPI and AFWMP such as months of farming work may have shown a more significant relationship (Jeon et al, 2016).

    Surprisingly, the correlation analysis of the variables associated with WPI, pain intensity of neck part and pain intensity when bending and rotation the neck showed negative correlations with BMI, whereas other variables of pain intensity such as WPI according to the body part and physical movements were not significantly correlated with. As BMI decreased, the WPI of the neck and in neck bending and rotation increased. In the case of Ethiopian farmers who predominantly cultivate soybean, thin farmers may be more likely to develop WMSP of the neck.

    This study has several limitations, which requires that our findings be interpreted with care. First, although this study used a nationally representative sample, the study sample might not be entirely representative of the agricultural worker population in all underdeveloped African nations. Second, this research relied largely on self-reported symptom data, which are subject to reporting bias. Third, we did not identify the distinct reasons for the significant correlations between musculoskeletal pain and healthy living variables. The other important limitation of this study was that it utilized a cross-sectional design that does not permit causal inferences from the observed relationships.

    In the additional studies of future should assess the effects of efforts to limit kneeling or squatting postures as well as the pushing, pulling, or lifting of heavy objects in order to avoid back and shoulder injuries; similarly, efforts should be made to limit the disproportionate labor intensity and to limit the working periods (Phajan et al, 2014). These should be supplemented with targeted health promotion programs including therapeutic exercises and ergonomic education of the risk factors of WMSP, in addition to recommendations for tools and environmental revisions to reduce work-associated physical requirements. Moreover, future studies should emphasize the development of practicable precautions for agricultural tasks related with vulnerability of musculoskeletal pain (Xiao et al, 2013). These interventions should be aimed to specific postures of physical movements. There is also a need for more precise records on agricultural workers in underdeveloped countries in order to support the managing of suitable public health (Xiao et al, 2013).

    Conclusion

    This study identified the actual status of work-related musculoskeletal disorders such as WMSP and WPI and investigated AFWMP and HFWMP in local farmers of Tigray, Ethiopia. WMSP were mostly noted when the farmers were required to adopt kneeling or squatting postures, while pulling, pushing, and lifting heavy objects primarily resulted in back and shoulder injuries. There were significant differences between the pain group and the non-pain group in age, self-perceived labor intensity, years of farming experience, and self-perceived health status. Older farmers with higher self-perceived labor intensity had an increased likelihood of WMSP. Age, months of farming work, and self-perceived health status were the major predictive variables for overall WPI. Analysis of WPI by physical movement, and WPI by body parts, and overall WPI revealed low correlations with age, months of farming work, and self-perceived health status.

    Therefore, the WMSP of Tigray local farmers in Ethiopia was associated with the characteristics of the farm work and health status. Furthermore, HFWMP and AFWMP were the chief features that could affect the occurrence of WMSP in this population. Both HFWMP and AFWMP should be considered in clinical health assessments of WMSP in farmers in underdeveloped countries. The findings of this study might be useful for regulating the prevention and management of WMSP in farmers in underdeveloped African countries.

    Figure

    PTK-24-2-76_F1.gif

    Location of Hawzen in Tigray province.

    Table

    Survey question items according to sections

    awork-related musculoskeletal pain
    bwork-related musculoskeletal pain intensity

    Characteristics of SDF, AFWMP, and HFWMP in participants (N=116)

    astandard deviation
    bsocio-demographic factors
    cbody mass index
    dagricultural factors associated work-related musculoskeletal pain
    ehealthy living and healthy behavior factors associated work-related musculoskeletal pain.

    Occurrence of work-related musculoskeletal pain according to physical movements and body parts in the pain group (N=88)

    awork-related musculoskeletal pain intensity.

    Correlations between WPI and factors according to sections in the pain group (N=88)

    awork-related musculoskeletal pain intensity
    bsociodemographic factors
    cbody mass index
    dagricultural work fctors associated work-related musculoskeletal pain
    ehealthy living and healthy behavior factors associated work-related musculoskeletal pain.
    *p<.05
    **p<.01.

    Multiple linear regression model for the prediction of factors influencing overall WPI in the pain group (N=88)

    avariance inflation factor
    bwork-related musculoskeletal pain intensity
    *p<.05
    **p<.01.

    Comparisons between pain and non-pain groups (N=116)

    achi-square test
    bindependent T-test
    cstandard deviation
    dsocio-demographic factors
    ebody mass index
    fagricultural work factors associated work-related musculoskeletal pain
    ghealthy living and healthy behavior factors associated work-related musculoskeletal pain
    *p<.05
    **p<.01
    †normal distribution.

    Binary logistic regression analysis of the variables that affected the occurrence of WMSP (N=116)

    aNagelkerke R2=26.7%
    badjusted for gender; Nagelkerke R2=26.9%
    cadjusted for gender and chronic disease; Nagelkerke R2=14.8%
    dodds ratios
    econfidence interval
    *p<.05
    **p<.01

    Reference

    1. Abafita J , Kim C.S (2015) Determinants of children’s schooling: The case of Tigray Region , Ethiopia. Educ. Res. Rev, Vol.10 (8) ; pp.1130-1146
    2. Abay F , Bjørnstad A , Smale M (2009) Measuring on Farm iversity and Determinants of Barley Diversity in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia , MEJS, Vol.1 (2) ; pp.44-66
    3. Abera M , Robbins J.M , Tesfaye M (2015) Parents’ perception of child and adolescent mental health problems and their choice of treatment option in southwest Ethiopia , Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health, Vol.9 ; pp.40https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-015-0072-5
    4. Aseyehegn K , Yirga C , Rajan S (2012) Effect of small-scale irrigation on the income of rural farm households: The case of Laelay Maichew District, Central Tigray, Ethiopia , J. Agric. Sci, Vol.7 (1) ; pp.43-57
    5. Assefa T , Sperling L , Dagne B (2014) Participatory Plant Breeding with Traders and Farmers for White Pea Bean in Ethiopia , J. Agric. Educ. Ext, Vol.20 (5) ; pp.497-512
    6. Birmeta K , Sim B.R , Kim D.H (2015) Analyzing Barriers to Accessing Health Care Services in Holeta Town, Ethiopia , Prim. Health Care, Vol.5 (2) ; pp.1-7
    7. Brock M , Northcraft-Baxtera L , Escofferyb C (2012) Musculoskeletal health in South Georgia farmworkers: A mixed methods study , Work, Vol.43 (2) ; pp.223-236
    8. Croppenstedt A , Muller C (2000) The Impact of Farmers’ Health and Nutritional Status on Their Productivity and Efficiency: Evidence fromEthiopia , Econ. Dev. Cult. Change, Vol.48 (3) ; pp.475-502
    9. Da Costa B.R , Vieira E.R (2010) Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review of recent longitudinal studies , Am. J. Ind. Med, Vol.53 (3) ; pp.285-323https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20750
    10. Dercon S , Hoddinott J (2004) The Ethiopian rural household surveys: Introduction. International Food Policy Research Institute, DC Photocopy,
    11. Deressa A (2013) Evaluation of Soil Acidity in Agricultural Soils of Smallholder Farmers in South Western Ethiopia , Sci Technol Arts Res J, Vol.2 (2) ; pp.1-6
    12. Federal democratic republic of ethiopia central statistical agency (2009) Agricultural sample survey 2008/2009 , Report on area and production of crops, Vol.volume 1
    13. Federal democratic republic of ethiopia central statistical agency (2011) Large and medium scale commercial farms sample survey 2010/2011 , Report on area and production of crops, and farm management practices, Vol.volume 8
    14. Federal democratic republic of ethiopia (2007) Ministry of Health. version 1 , Health and Health Related Indicators,
    15. Federal democratic republic of ethiopia central statistical agency (2007) Rural investment climate survey 2006/2007 , Report on rural nonfarm enterprises, investment climate constraints, infrastructure accessibility, and households employment, Vol.volume 1
    16. Fantahun M , Degu G (2003) Health Service Utilization in Amhara Region of Ethiopia , Ethiop. J. Health Dev, Vol.17 (2) ; pp.140-147
    17. Fulmer S , Punnett L , Slingerland T (2002) Ergonomic exposures in apple harvesting: Preliminary observations , Am. J. Ind. Med, ; pp.3-9
    18. Gebregziabher G , Holden S (2011) Does irrigation enhance and food deficits discourage fertilizer adoption in a risky environment? Evidence from Tigray, Ethiopia , J. Dev. Agric. Econ, Vol.3 (10) ; pp.514-528
    19. Holmberg S , Stiernstrom E.L , Thelin A (2002) Musculoskeletal symptoms among farmers and non-farmers: A population-based study , Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health, Vol.8 (4) ; pp.339-345
    20. Hurissa B (2011) Urban Poverty Alleviation in Ethiopia: Reflections on Government Strategies , J Poverty Alleviation Int Dev, Vol.2 (1) ; pp.71-96
    21. Jeon MJ , Jeon HS , Lee TJ (2016) Musculoskeletal pain status of the Lyamungu local farmers in Tanzania: Relationship between musculoskeletal pain and agricultural working environments, health factors, socio-economic factors , JRSD, Vol.25 (s) ; pp.149-183
    22. Jo H , Baek S , Park H.W (2016) Farmers’ cohort for agricultural work-related musculoskeletal disorders (FARM) study: Study design, methods,and baseline characteristics of enrolled subjects , J. Epidemiol, Vol.26 (1) ; pp.50-56https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20140271
    23. Kanavos P , Mossialos E (1999) International comparisons of health care expenditures: What we know and what we do not know , Journal of Health Service Research, Vol.4 (2) ; pp.122-126
    24. Kolstrup C.L (2012) Work-related musculoskeletal discomfort of dairy farmers and employed workers , J. Occup. Med. Toxicol, Vol.7 (1) ; pp.23https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-7-23
    25. Lee K , Lim H.S (2008) Work-related Injuries and Diseases of Farmers in Korea , Ind. Health, Vol.46 (5) ; pp.424-434
    26. Lee S.J , Tak S , Alterman T (2014) Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among agricultural workers in the United States: An analysis of the National Health Interview Survey, 2004-2008 , J. Agromed, Vol.19 (3) ; pp.268-280https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2014.916642
    27. Lewis M.Q , Sprince N.L , Burmeister L.F (1998) Workrelated injuries among Iowa farm operators: An analysis of the Iowa Farm Family Health andHazard Surveillance Project , Am. J. Ind. Med, Vol.33 (5) ; pp.510-517
    28. Lyman S , McGwin G Jr, Enochs R (1999) History of agricultural injury among farmers in Alabama and Mississippi: Prevalence, characteristics, and associated factors , Am. J. Ind. Med, Vol.33 (5) ; pp.499-510
    29. Németh G , Arborelius U.P , Svensson O.K (1990) The load on the low back and hips and muscular activity during machine milking , Int. J. Ind. Ergon, Vol.5 (2) ; pp.115-123
    30. Nevala-Puranen N , Taattola K , Venalainen J.M (1993) Rail system decreases physical strain in milking , Int. J. Ind. Ergon, Vol.12 (4) ; pp.311-316
    31. Nonnenmann M.W , Anton D , Gerr F (2008) Musculoskeletal symptoms of the neck and upper extremities among iowa dairy farmers , Am. J. Ind. Med, Vol.51 (6) ; pp.443-451https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20582
    32. Osborne A , Blake C , Meredith D (2013) Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among irish farm operators , Am. J. Ind. Med, Vol.56 (2) ; pp.235-242https://doi.org10.1002/ajim.22092
    33. Osborne A , Finnegan G , Blake C (2013) An evaluation of low back pain among farmers in Ireland , Occup. Med. (Lond.), Vol.63 (1) ; pp.53-59https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs173
    34. Phajan T , Nilvarangkul K , Settheetham D (2014) Work-related musculoskeletal disorders amongsugarcane farmers in north-eastern Thailand , Asia Pac. J. Public Health, Vol.26 (3) ; pp.320-327https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539514528026
    35. Phillips C , Main C , Buck R (2008) Prioritising pain in policy making: The need for a whole systems perspective , Health Policy, Vol.88 (2-3) ; pp.166-175https://doi.org10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.008
    36. Rosecrance J , Rodgers G , Merlino L (2006) Low back pain and musculoskeletal symptoms among Kansas farmers , Am. J. Ind. Med, Vol.49 (7) ; pp.547-556
    37. Skovron M.L , Szpalski M , Nordin M (1994) Sociocultural factors and back pain. A population-based study in Belgian adults , Spine (Phila Pa 1976), Vol.19 (2) ; pp.129-377
    38. Sorainen E , Penttinen J , Kallio M (1998) Whole-body vibration of tractor drivers during harrowing , Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J, Vol.59 (9) ; pp.642-644
    39. Swangnetr M , Kaber D (2014) Analysis of novice and experienced rice farmer grip force and arm muscle activity in a plowing task , Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors Part II, Vol.15 (49)
    40. UNDP (2010) Human Development Report 2010,
    41. Walker-Bone K , Palmer K.T (2002) Musculoskeletal disord ers in farmers and farm workers , Occup. Med. (Lond.), Vol.52 (8) ; pp.441-450
    42. Xiao H , McCurdy S.A , Stoecklin-Marois M.T (2013) Agricultural work and chronic musculoskeletal pain among latino farm workers: The MICASA study , Am. J. Ind. Med, Vol.56 (2) ; pp.216-225https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22118